Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal R. Co. v. United States

389 U.S. 88
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 6, 1967
Docket539
StatusPublished

This text of 389 U.S. 88 (Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal R. Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal R. Co. v. United States, 389 U.S. 88 (1967).

Opinion

389 U.S. 88

88 S.Ct. 253

19 L.Ed.2d 255

BALTIMORE & OHIO CHICAGO TERMINAL R. CO. et al.
v.
UNITED STATES et al.

No. 539.

Supreme Court of the United States

October Term, 1967.

November 6, 1967

John H. Gobel, for appellants.

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt, for appellees United States and others.

Don McDevitt, for appellees Atchison, T. & S. F. and others.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm the granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Umans v. United States
389 U.S. 80 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
389 U.S. 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baltimore-ohio-chicago-terminal-r-co-v-united-states-scotus-1967.