Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal R. Co. v. United States
389 U.S. 88
Opinion
88 S.Ct. 253
19 L.Ed.2d 255
BALTIMORE & OHIO CHICAGO TERMINAL R. CO. et al.
v.
UNITED STATES et al.
No. 539.
Supreme Court of the United States
October Term, 1967.
November 6, 1967
John H. Gobel, for appellants.
Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt, for appellees United States and others.
Don McDevitt, for appellees Atchison, T. & S. F. and others.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm the granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal R. Co. v. United States, 389 U.S. 88 (1967).
389 U.S. 88 (Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal R. Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Umans v. United States
389 U.S. 80 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad v. United States
389 U.S. 88 (Supreme Court, 1967)