Baltimore & O. R. v. Schank

Sixth Circuit

Baltimore & O. R. v. Schank

131 F.2d 219, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2765

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 8, 1942

DocketNo. 9254

StatusPublished

This text of 131 F.2d 219 (Baltimore & O. R. v. Schank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baltimore & O. R. v. Schank, 131 F.2d 219, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2765 (6th Cir. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript, briefs and arguments of counsel, and it appearing that there was substantial evidence to support the verdict, and that there was therefore no error to decline to direct the jury to return a verdict for appellant or to decline to grant appellant’s motion for judgment, notwithstanding the verdict, and it appearing that the court did not err in holding that appellee’s right of recovery was based upon the laws of Ohio, or in declining to charge the jury that appellee’s decedent was engaged in interstate commerce at the time he was injured, and it appearing that there is no reversible error upon the record, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be and the same is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript, briefs and arguments of counsel, and it appearing that there was substantial evidence to support the verdict, and that there was therefore no error to decline to direct the jury to return a verdict for appellant or to decline to grant appellant’s motion for judgment, notwithstanding the verdict, and it appearing that the court did not err in holding that appellee’s right of recovery was based upon the laws of Ohio, or in declining to charge the jury that appellee’s decedent was engaged in interstate commerce at the time he was injured, and it appearing that there is no reversible error upon the record, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be and the same is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 F.2d 219, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baltimore-o-r-v-schank-ca6-1942.