Baltimore & O. R. v. Joy

Sixth Circuit

Baltimore & O. R. v. Joy

113 F. 1016, 14 Ohio F. Dec. 64, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4021

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided January 13, 1902·No. No. 311·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Action for personal injuries sustained through alleged negligence of the railroad company by John A. Hervey while a passenger. The injury occurred in Indiana. The action was brought in Ohio. Pending the action the plaintiff died. On application of the administrator of said Hervey, he was permitted to revive and prosecute same as administrator. This revivor was excepted .to and assigned as error. Upon an interrogatory certified to the supreme court, that court has answered that there was no error in the revivor. 173 U. S. 226, 19 Sup. Ct. 387, 43 L. Ed. 677. The case having been submitted alone upon this question, it is now ordered that the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Action for personal injuries sustained through alleged negligence of the railroad company by John A. Hervey while a passenger. The injury occurred in Indiana. The action was brought in Ohio. Pending the action the plaintiff died. On application of the administrator of said Hervey, he was permitted to revive and prosecute same as administrator. This revivor was excepted .to and assigned as error. Upon an interrogatory certified to the supreme court, that court has answered that there was no error in the revivor. 173 U. S. 226, 19 Sup. Ct. 387, 43 L. Ed. 677. The case having been submitted alone upon this question, it is now ordered that the judgment be affirmed.

Baltimore & O. R. v. Joy, 113 F. 1016, 14 Ohio F. Dec. 64, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4021 (6th Cir. 1902).

Pincite

113 F. 1016 (Baltimore & O. R. v. Joy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related