Baltimore Crab Place, Inc. v. Rosen

296 So. 2d 587, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7005
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 28, 1974·No. Nos. 73-1349, 73-1421·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rule that the court may, upon receiving a motion which is upon its face a nullity and filed after the court has ordered the filing of an answer, treat the motion as a nullity and enter a default for failure to plead. See Eli Witt Cigar & Tobacco Co. v. Somers, 99 Fla. 592, 127 So. 333 (1930).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baltimore Crab Place, Inc. v. Rosen, 296 So. 2d 587, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7005 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

296 So. 2d 587 (Baltimore Crab Place, Inc. v. Rosen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eli Witt Cigar & Tobacco Co. v. Somers
127 So. 333 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)