Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Honorable James C. Connell
This text of 230 F.2d 948 (Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Honorable James C. Connell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
230 F.2d 948
BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
Honorable James C. CONNELL, Respondent.
No. 12800.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Feb. 13, 1956.
Baker, Hostetler & Patterson, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner.
No appearance for respondent.
Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 F.2d 948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baltimore-and-ohio-railroad-company-v-honorable-ja-ca6-1956.