Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Honorable James C. Connell

230 F.2d 948
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 13, 1956·No. 12800·Published

Opinion

230 F.2d 948

BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
Honorable James C. CONNELL, Respondent.

No. 12800.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 13, 1956.

Baker, Hostetler & Patterson, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Honorable James C. Connell, 230 F.2d 948 (6th Cir. 1956).

230 F.2d 948 (Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Honorable James C. Connell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.