Balthazar v. Mari Ltd.

396 U.S. 114, 90 S. Ct. 397
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 8, 1969·No. 593·Published·Cited by 31 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balthazar v. Mari Ltd., 396 U.S. 114, 90 S. Ct. 397 (1969).

396 U.S. 114 (Balthazar v. Mari Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
N.D. New York, 2026
Continental Resources v. Fair
311 Neb. 184 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2022)
Coleman v. District of Columbia
70 F. Supp. 3d 58 (District of Columbia, 2014)
McCann v. Scaduto
123 A.D.2d 111 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Sheehan v. County of Suffolk
490 N.E.2d 523 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10, Assessed to Spitz
376 A.2d 909 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1977)