Balthazar v. Mari Ltd.

396 U.S. 114, 90 S. Ct. 397
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 8, 1969
Docket593
StatusPublished
Cited by31 cases

This text of 396 U.S. 114 (Balthazar v. Mari Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Balthazar v. Mari Ltd., 396 U.S. 114, 90 S. Ct. 397 (1969).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Continental Resources v. Fair
311 Neb. 184 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2022)
Coleman v. District of Columbia
70 F. Supp. 3d 58 (District of Columbia, 2014)
McCann v. Scaduto
123 A.D.2d 111 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Sheehan v. County of Suffolk
490 N.E.2d 523 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Township of Montville v. Block 69, Lot 10, Assessed to Spitz
376 A.2d 909 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
396 U.S. 114, 90 S. Ct. 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balthazar-v-mari-ltd-scotus-1969.