Balthaser v. Bitner

61 Pa. Super. 611, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 381
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 20, 1915·No. Appeal, No. 184·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are of opinion that the questions raised by the assignments of error are correctly and adequately answered in the well-considered opinion filed by the learned president judge of the Common Pleas in discharging the rule for new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto. The assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balthaser v. Bitner, 61 Pa. Super. 611, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 381 (Pa. Ct. App. 1915).

61 Pa. Super. 611 (Balthaser v. Bitner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Schwartz
60 Pa. D. & C. 269 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1947)
Davis v. Derbyshire
39 Pa. D. & C. 368 (Lycoming County Court of Common Pleas, 1940)
Williams v. Ricca Et Ux. (Et Al.)
187 A. 722 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)