Balthasar v. J. A. Migel, Inc.
212 A.D. 879
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1925·No. Appeal No. 1·Published
Opinion
Order modified by striking out the requirement of a further bill of particulars as to demands 8, 10, 12, 13, 16 and 18, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Balthasar v. J. A. Migel, Inc., 212 A.D. 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).
212 A.D. 879 (Balthasar v. J. A. Migel, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.