Balter v. Ethyl Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Balter v. Ethyl Corp.

386 So. 2d 1226, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17459

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 8, 1980

DocketNo. 78-1402

StatusPublished

This text of 386 So. 2d 1226 (Balter v. Ethyl Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Balter v. Ethyl Corp., 386 So. 2d 1226, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17459 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final order under review is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) the underlying judgment upon which pre-judgment interest was sought and denied below is itself subject to reversal as to the defendant Ethyl Corporation, and, consequently, pre-judgment interest thereon was properly denied as to such defendant, Ethyl Corporation v. Balter, 386 So.2d 1220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (case no. 78-994, opinion released this date), and (b) pre-judgment interest on the plaintiff Balter’s claim for tortious interference with advantageous contractual relations against the defendants herein did not lie, in any event, because, in our view, neither test for the allowance of such interest established by Sullivan v. McMillan, 37 Fla. 134, 143-144, 19 So. 340, 343 (1896), was met in this case. Vacation Prizes, Inc. v. City National Bank of Miami Beach, 227 So.2d 352 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final order under review is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) the underlying judgment upon which pre-judgment interest was sought and denied below is itself subject to reversal as to the defendant Ethyl Corporation, and, consequently, pre-judgment interest thereon was properly denied as to such defendant, Ethyl Corporation v. Balter, 386 So.2d 1220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (case no. 78-994, opinion released this date), and (b) pre-judgment interest on the plaintiff Balter’s claim for tortious interference with advantageous contractual relations against the defendants herein did not lie, in any event, because, in our view, neither test for the allowance of such interest established by Sullivan v. McMillan, 37 Fla. 134, 143-144, 19 So. 340, 343 (1896), was met in this case. Vacation Prizes, Inc. v. City National Bank of Miami Beach, 227 So.2d 352 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

386 So. 2d 1226, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balter-v-ethyl-corp-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack