Balter v. Ethyl Corp.

386 So. 2d 1226, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17459
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 8, 1980·No. No. 78-1402·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final order under review is affirmed upon a holding that: (a) the underlying judgment upon which pre-judgment interest was sought and denied below is itself subject to reversal as to the defendant Ethyl Corporation, and, consequently, pre-judgment interest thereon was properly denied as to such defendant, Ethyl Corporation v. Balter, 386 So.2d 1220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (case no. 78-994, opinion released this date), and (b) pre-judgment interest on the plaintiff Balter’s claim for tortious interference with advantageous contractual relations against the defendants herein did not lie, in any event, because, in our view, neither test for the allowance of such interest established by Sullivan v. McMillan, 37 Fla. 134, 143-144, 19 So. 340, 343 (1896), was met in this case. Vacation Prizes, Inc. v. City National Bank of Miami Beach, 227 So.2d 352 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balter v. Ethyl Corp., 386 So. 2d 1226, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17459 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

386 So. 2d 1226 (Balter v. Ethyl Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ethyl Corp. v. Balter
386 So. 2d 1220 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Vacation Prizes, Inc. v. City Nat. Bank of Miami Beach
227 So. 2d 352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Sullivan v. McMillan
37 Fla. 134 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1896)