Baltamore Vigil v. Bobby Barba
This text of Baltamore Vigil v. Bobby Barba (Baltamore Vigil v. Bobby Barba) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-18-00331-CV
BALTAMORE VIGIL, APPELLANT
V.
BOBBY BARBA, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 222nd District Court Deaf Smith County, Texas Trial Court No. CI-20151-138, Honorable Roland D. Saul, Presiding
March 21, 2019
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ.
Appellant, Baltamore Vigil, appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary
judgment in favor of appellee, Bobby Barba. Vigil’s brief was originally due December
31, 2018. We granted Vigil three extensions to file a brief. By letter of February 21, 2019,
we notified Vigil that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution if a brief
was not received by March 11. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b). On March 11,
Vigil filed his fourth motion for an extension seeking until March 18 to file a brief. To date, Vigil has not filed a brief or had any further communication with this Court. Accordingly,
we deny his fourth motion for an extension of time to file a brief.
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Baltamore Vigil v. Bobby Barba, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baltamore-vigil-v-bobby-barba-texapp-2019.