Baltamore Vigil v. Bobby Barba

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 21, 2019
Docket07-18-00331-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Baltamore Vigil v. Bobby Barba (Baltamore Vigil v. Bobby Barba) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baltamore Vigil v. Bobby Barba, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-18-00331-CV

BALTAMORE VIGIL, APPELLANT

V.

BOBBY BARBA, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 222nd District Court Deaf Smith County, Texas Trial Court No. CI-20151-138, Honorable Roland D. Saul, Presiding

March 21, 2019

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ.

Appellant, Baltamore Vigil, appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary

judgment in favor of appellee, Bobby Barba. Vigil’s brief was originally due December

31, 2018. We granted Vigil three extensions to file a brief. By letter of February 21, 2019,

we notified Vigil that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution if a brief

was not received by March 11. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b). On March 11,

Vigil filed his fourth motion for an extension seeking until March 18 to file a brief. To date, Vigil has not filed a brief or had any further communication with this Court. Accordingly,

we deny his fourth motion for an extension of time to file a brief.

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)

Per Curiam

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Baltamore Vigil v. Bobby Barba, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baltamore-vigil-v-bobby-barba-texapp-2019.