Balt v. J.S. Funding Corp.

230 A.D.2d 699, 646 N.Y.S.2d 50, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8234
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 5, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to determine certain rights to real property pursuant to RPAPL article 15, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Yoswein, J.), dated March 9, 1995, which, inter alia, granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss their complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A tenant is not an indispensable party to a foreclosure action, and the failure to name a tenant does not render the judgment of foreclosure and sale defective (see, 1 Bergman, New York Mortgage Foreclosures § 12.03 [1]; see also, Genuth v First Div. Ave. Realty Corp., 88 Misc 2d 586). Accordingly, there is no merit to the plaintiffs’ challenge to the amended judgment of foreclosure and sale entered in a related action.

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit.

Thompson, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balt v. J.S. Funding Corp., 230 A.D.2d 699, 646 N.Y.S.2d 50, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8234 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

230 A.D.2d 699 (Balt v. J.S. Funding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Mazzara
124 A.D.3d 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
NYCTL 1998-2 Trust v. Michael Holdings, Inc.
77 A.D.3d 805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)