Balsley v. Hetzel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Balsley v. Hetzel

182 Ill. App. 136

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 9, 1913

DocketGen. No. 18,005

StatusPublished

This text of 182 Ill. App. 136 (Balsley v. Hetzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Balsley v. Hetzel, 182 Ill. App. 136 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Release, § 26*—questions for jury. In an action against two tort feasors, the question whether a certain sum paid to plaintiff by one of the defendants after the commencement of the suit was received in satisfaction of all claims against such defendant, held properly submitted to the jury. 4. Appeal and errob, § 1507*—when restricting cross-examination as to release, not error. Trial court’s ruling in sustaining objections to questions asked plaintiff on cross-examination relative to her acceptance of a certain sum paid plaintiff by one of the defendants,. held not error where the court allowed counsel large latitude in questioning witness as to such subject.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Release, § 26*—questions for jury. In an action against two tort feasors, the question whether a certain sum paid to plaintiff by one of the defendants after the commencement of the suit was received in satisfaction of all claims against such defendant, held properly submitted to the jury. 4. Appeal and errob, § 1507*—when restricting cross-examination as to release, not error. Trial court’s ruling in sustaining objections to questions asked plaintiff on cross-examination relative to her acceptance of a certain sum paid plaintiff by one of the defendants,. held not error where the court allowed counsel large latitude in questioning witness as to such subject.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 Ill. App. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balsley-v-hetzel-illappct-1913.