Balsley v. Hetzel

182 Ill. App. 136
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 9, 1913·No. Gen. No. 18,005·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Release, § 26*—questions for jury. In an action against two tort feasors, the question whether a certain sum paid to plaintiff by one of the defendants after the commencement of the suit was received in satisfaction of all claims against such defendant, held properly submitted to the jury. 4. Appeal and errob, § 1507*—when restricting cross-examination as to release, not error. Trial court’s ruling in sustaining objections to questions asked plaintiff on cross-examination relative to her acceptance of a certain sum paid plaintiff by one of the defendants,. held not error where the court allowed counsel large latitude in questioning witness as to such subject.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balsley v. Hetzel, 182 Ill. App. 136 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

182 Ill. App. 136 (Balsley v. Hetzel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.