Balsam v. State
This text of 69 So. 236 (Balsam v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe judgment in this case is affirmed on tbe authority of Mangeldorf v. State, 8 Ala. App. 302, 62 South. 373, Ex parte Mangeldorf, 185 Ala. 33, 64 South. 598, and State v. Parker, 5 Ala. App. 231, 59 South. 741, which settle, adversely to appellant, every question raised in tbe case, except tbe contention that tbe fact of tbe repeal, since defendant’s conviction, of tbe act under which defendant was convicted, destroys tbe prosecution. That contention is equally without merit.—Code, § 7806) Birmingham v. Baranco, 4 Ala. App. 279; 58 South. 944.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 So. 236, 13 Ala. App. 252, 1915 Ala. App. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balsam-v-state-alactapp-1915.