Balsam v. Board of Education of Copiague Union Free School District
This text of 82 A.D.2d 795 (Balsam v. Board of Education of Copiague Union Free School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action involving the alleged breach of a contract of employment, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), entered March 31, 1980, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Summary judgment was properly granted against the plaintiff, essentially for the reasons stated by Mr. Justice Jones at Special Term. We add that plaintiff’s argument that his rights under section 10 of article I of the Constitution of the United States have been violated is without merit (see Weisel v Hagdahl Realty Co., 241 App Div 314, 319-320). Titone, J.P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 A.D.2d 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balsam-v-board-of-education-of-copiague-union-free-school-district-nyappdiv-1981.