Balsam v. Board of Education of Copiague Union Free School District

82 A.D.2d 795

Opinion

In an action involving the alleged breach of a contract of employment, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), entered March 31, 1980, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Summary judgment was properly granted against the plaintiff, essentially for the reasons stated by Mr. Justice Jones at Special Term. We add that plaintiff’s argument that his rights under section 10 of article I of the Constitution of the United States have been violated is without merit (see Weisel v Hagdahl Realty Co., 241 App Div 314, 319-320). Titone, J.P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balsam v. Board of Education of Copiague Union Free School District, 82 A.D.2d 795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

82 A.D.2d 795 (Balsam v. Board of Education of Copiague Union Free School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weisel v. Hagdahl Realty Co.
241 A.D. 314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)