Bals v. Champlain Coach Lines, Inc.
This text of 255 A.D. 970 (Bals v. Champlain Coach Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, upon the ground that plaintiff’s statement that $25,000 had been offered in settlement was so prejudicial to defendant that its motion for a mistrial should have been granted. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 A.D. 970, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bals-v-champlain-coach-lines-inc-nyappdiv-1938.