Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Balom v. State

Balom v. State

126 So. 3d 1167, 2012 WL 3023207, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12082
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 25, 2012
DocketNo. 4D11-4234
StatusPublished

This text of 126 So. 3d 1167 (Balom v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Balom v. State, 126 So. 3d 1167, 2012 WL 3023207, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12082 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Maestas v. State, 76 So.3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

STEVENSON, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maestas v. State
76 So. 3d 991 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 So. 3d 1167, 2012 WL 3023207, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balom-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.