Balmer v. Balmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Balmer v. Balmer

5 A.D.2d 839, 170 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6987

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 839 (Balmer v. Balmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Balmer v. Balmer, 5 A.D.2d 839, 170 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6987 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the [840]*840Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, (1) denying in part and granting in part appellants’ motion to vacate respondent’s notice to examine appellant Edward Moritz, individually and as an executor of the estate, before trial as an adverse party, and (2) granting respondent’s cross motion for said examination to the extent of directing the examination of said appellant Edward Moritz, in his individual capacity, as to all items requested, and in his representative capacity as to all matters occurring after the date of his qualification as an executor. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the [840]*840Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, (1) denying in part and granting in part appellants’ motion to vacate respondent’s notice to examine appellant Edward Moritz, individually and as an executor of the estate, before trial as an adverse party, and (2) granting respondent’s cross motion for said examination to the extent of directing the examination of said appellant Edward Moritz, in his individual capacity, as to all items requested, and in his representative capacity as to all matters occurring after the date of his qualification as an executor. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 839, 170 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balmer-v-balmer-nyappdiv-1958.