Balm v. City of Cape May
127 A. 923, 101 N.J.L. 400, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 244
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, fox the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Campbell in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenohaed, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Lloyd, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlbnnon, Kays, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Balm v. City of Cape May, 127 A. 923, 101 N.J.L. 400, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 244 (N.J. 1925).
127 A. 923 (Balm v. City of Cape May) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coyte v. King
168 A. 158 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933)