Ballway v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ballway v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.

70 A.D.2d 675, 416 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12154

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.D.2d 675 (Ballway v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ballway v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co., 70 A.D.2d 675, 416 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 21, 1977, as corrected by decision filed April 21, 1978, which held that claimant does not have a causally related disability subsequent to December 4, 1972 from an accident of November 8, 1972. The board found: "based on examination and report of Dr. Bastable finding no causally related disability for the November 6, 1972 [sic] injury, and in view of the testimony of Dr. Gruman and Dr. Naumann reporting underlying osteoarthritis that claimant has no causally related disability to the back.” The decision of the board is supported by substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Staley, Jr., Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 21, 1977, as corrected by decision filed April 21, 1978, which held that claimant does not have a causally related disability subsequent to December 4, 1972 from an accident of November 8, 1972. The board found: "based on examination and report of Dr. Bastable finding no causally related disability for the November 6, 1972 [sic] injury, and in view of the testimony of Dr. Gruman and Dr. Naumann reporting underlying osteoarthritis that claimant has no causally related disability to the back.” The decision of the board is supported by substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Staley, Jr., Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 675, 416 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballway-v-f-m-schaefer-brewing-co-nyappdiv-1979.