Ballot v. Weinstein
246 A.D. 831
Opinion
Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits in an action for criminal conversation reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Even if plaintiff ceased to have affection for his wife prior to her illegal relations with defendant, that would not bar an action for criminal conversation. (Oppenheim v. Kridel, 236 N. Y. 156; Berney v. Adriance, 157 App. Div. 628; Purdy v. Robinson, 133 id. 155.) Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ballot v. Weinstein, 246 A.D. 831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
246 A.D. 831 (Ballot v. Weinstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Oppenheim v. . Kridel
140 N.E. 227 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Berney v. Adriance
157 A.D. 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)