Ballot v. Weinstein
This text of 246 A.D. 831 (Ballot v. Weinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits in an action for criminal conversation reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Even if plaintiff ceased to have affection for his wife prior to her illegal relations with defendant, that would not bar an action for criminal conversation. (Oppenheim v. Kridel, 236 N. Y. 156; Berney v. Adriance, 157 App. Div. 628; Purdy v. Robinson, 133 id. 155.) Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballot-v-weinstein-nyappdiv-1936.