Balliviero v. Konrad

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 8, 2003·No. 02-30222·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30222 Summary Calendar

LLOYD BALLIVIERO,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GORDON K. KONRAD; LANA WERNER KONRAD; SHAWN M. KONRAD; BELLE CHASSE MARINE TRANSPORTATION, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 01-CV-2014-K -------------------- January 7, 2003

Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gordon K. Konrad, Lana Werner Konrad, Shawn M. Konrad, and

Belle Chasse Marine Transportation, Inc., appeal the order

dismissing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A) Lloyd

Balliviero’s action without prejudice due to misrepresentations

on his in forma pauperis affidavit. They argue that the

dismissal should have been with prejudice.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-30222 -2-

After a hearing, the district court determined that the

circumstances of Balliviero’s misrepresentations warranted a

dismissal without prejudice. The defendants have not shown that

the district court abused its discretion. See, e.g., Lay v.

Justices-Middle Dist. Court, 811 F.2d 285, 286 (5th Cir. 1987).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balliviero v. Konrad, (5th Cir. 2003).

Balliviero v. Konrad (Balliviero v. Konrad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related