Balliro v. Goldman

379 So. 2d 166, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23311
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 22, 1980·No. No. 79-404·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Voorheis v. Barnsley, 116 Fla. 191, 156 So.2d 234 (1934); Claffey v. Serafino, 338 So.2d 270 (Fla.2d DCA 1976); Perry v. University Cabs, Inc., 344 So.2d 914 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); Allen v. Wright, 350 So.2d 111 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Westinghouse Credit Corporation v. Steven Lake Masonry Inc., 356 So.2d 1329 (Fla.4th DCA 1978).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balliro v. Goldman, 379 So. 2d 166, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23311 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

379 So. 2d 166 (Balliro v. Goldman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Llerena v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co.
379 So. 2d 166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)