Ballinger v. Wilson

54 A. 1125, 65 N.J. Eq. 403, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 287
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 11, 1903·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the making of the decree appealed from there was no error which was prejudicial to the appellant. Upon the proofs submitted the respondents were entitled to recover from the appellant, at the very least, the $50 ordered to be paid by him. to the respondents.

The decree should be affirmed.

[404]*404For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yoorhees, Yroom, Green- — -14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ballinger v. Wilson, 54 A. 1125, 65 N.J. Eq. 403, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 287 (N.J. 1903).

54 A. 1125 (Ballinger v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.