Ballinger v. Wilson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Ballinger v. Wilson

54 A. 1125, 65 N.J. Eq. 403, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 287

DecidedMarch 11, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A. 1125 (Ballinger v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ballinger v. Wilson, 54 A. 1125, 65 N.J. Eq. 403, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 287 (N.J. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the making of the decree appealed from there was no error which was prejudicial to the appellant. Upon the proofs submitted the respondents were entitled to recover from the appellant, at the very least, the $50 ordered to be paid by him. to the respondents.

The decree should be affirmed.

[404]*404For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yoorhees, Yroom, Green- — -14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In the making of the decree appealed from there was no error which was prejudicial to the appellant. Upon the proofs submitted the respondents were entitled to recover from the appellant, at the very least, the $50 ordered to be paid by him. to the respondents.

The decree should be affirmed.

[404]*404For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yoorhees, Yroom, Green- — -14.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A. 1125, 65 N.J. Eq. 403, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballinger-v-wilson-nj-1903.