Ballinger Lee v. Von Weise

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Ballinger Lee v. Von Weise

1912 OK 7, 121 P. 250, 32 Okla. 114, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 229

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 9, 1912·No. 1607·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

AMES, C.

The motion for new trial in this case was overruled on December 11th, and sixty days were al *115 lowed within which to serve the case-made. The case-made was served on February 11th. No extension of time was procured, and therefore the case was not served within the time fixed by the court. We cannot therefore consider errors not appearing on the record proper, and, as none of the errors assigned arise on the record proper, the case should be affirmed.

By the Court: .It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

AMES, C.

The motion for new trial in this case was overruled on December 11th, and sixty days were al *115 lowed within which to serve the case-made. The case-made was served on February 11th. No extension of time was procured, and therefore the case was not served within the time fixed by the court. We cannot therefore consider errors not appearing on the record proper, and, as none of the errors assigned arise on the record proper, the case should be affirmed.

By the Court: .It is so ordered.

Ballinger Lee v. Von Weise, 1912 OK 7, 121 P. 250, 32 Okla. 114, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 229 (Okla. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK 7 (Ballinger Lee v. Von Weise) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related