Ballin v. Clark

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Ballin v. Clark

140 N.Y.S. 378

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 7, 1913·Published

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

It is to be observed in this case that the order appealed from did not vacate the judgment which was granted upon the default. It is therefore not within the exception from appealable orders specified in section 257 of the Municipal Court Act. Dorfman v. Hirschfield, 53 Misc. Rep. 538, 103 N. Y. Supp. 698. Upon the merits, I am of opinion that the default should have been opened on the payment of moderate costs.

The order will be modified by granting the motion to open the default and vacate the judgment upon payment of $5 costs, and, as thus modified, it is hereby affirmed. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BIJUR, J.

It is to be observed in this case that the order appealed from did not vacate the judgment which was granted upon the default. It is therefore not within the exception from appealable orders specified in section 257 of the Municipal Court Act. Dorfman v. Hirschfield, 53 Misc. Rep. 538, 103 N. Y. Supp. 698. Upon the merits, I am of opinion that the default should have been opened on the payment of moderate costs.

The order will be modified by granting the motion to open the default and vacate the judgment upon payment of $5 costs, and, as thus modified, it is hereby affirmed. All concur.

Ballin v. Clark, 140 N.Y.S. 378 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

140 N.Y.S. 378 (Ballin v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related