Ballin v. Clark
This text of 140 N.Y.S. 378 (Ballin v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is to be observed in this case that the order appealed from did not vacate the judgment which was granted upon the default. It is therefore not within the exception from appealable orders specified in section 257 of the Municipal Court Act. Dorfman v. Hirschfield, 53 Misc. Rep. 538, 103 N. Y. Supp. 698. Upon the merits, I am of opinion that the default should have been opened on the payment of moderate costs.
The order will be modified by granting the motion to open the default and vacate the judgment upon payment of $5 costs, and, as thus modified, it is hereby affirmed. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 N.Y.S. 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballin-v-clark-nyappterm-1913.