Ballien v. Ramos

New York Court of Appeals

Ballien v. Ramos

300 N.E.2d 158, 32 N.Y.2d 904

DecidedJune 1, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 300 N.E.2d 158 (Ballien v. Ramos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ballien v. Ramos, 300 N.E.2d 158, 32 N.Y.2d 904 (N.Y. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

On both the main appeal and the cross appeal: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Full and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler. Judge Burke dissents and votes to reverse upon the ground that section 131 (subd. 7) of the Election Law precludes the holding of a primary this year on the Democratic line (see Matter of Ramos v. Alpert, decided herewith). Taking no part: Judge Breitel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On both the main appeal and the cross appeal: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Full and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler. Judge Burke dissents and votes to reverse upon the ground that section 131 (subd. 7) of the Election Law precludes the holding of a primary this year on the Democratic line (see Matter of Ramos v. Alpert, decided herewith). Taking no part: Judge Breitel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 N.E.2d 158, 32 N.Y.2d 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballien-v-ramos-ny-1973.