Ballew v. State

260 S.W.3d 427, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1058, 2008 WL 3295385
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 12, 2008
DocketED 89635
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 S.W.3d 427 (Ballew v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ballew v. State, 260 S.W.3d 427, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1058, 2008 WL 3295385 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Victor Ballew appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Penny v. ST. LOUIS DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES TREATMENT CENTER
260 S.W.3d 427 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 S.W.3d 427, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1058, 2008 WL 3295385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballew-v-state-moctapp-2008.