Ballew v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ballew v. State

245 S.E.2d 169, 145 Ga. App. 829, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2153

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 3, 1978

Docket51795

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 S.E.2d 169 (Ballew v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ballew v. State, 245 S.E.2d 169, 145 Ga. App. 829, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2153 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

Five jurors aren’t enough! There must be at least six. So held the Supreme Court of the United States in four separate opinions reversing this court’s decision in Ballew v. State, 138 Ga. App. 530 (227 SE2d 65) (1976), — U. S. — (98 SC 1029, 55 LE2d 234) (1978).

In our consideration of the five-man jury issue, we were bound by Sanders v. State, 234 Ga. 586 (216 SE2d 838) (1975), cert. den., 424 U. S. 931 (1976). Also in Williams v. Florida, 399 U. S. 78, 91 n. 28 (90 SC 1893, 26 LE2d 446, 455) (1970) the Supreme Court of the United States had said: "We have no occasion in this case to determine what minimum number can still constitute a 'jury,’ but we do not doubt that six is above that minimum.” The Supreme Court’s decision now has removed that equivocation, and has established that a jury of fewer than six persons deprived Ballew of the right to trial by jury guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.¹

[830]*830Decided May 3, 1978. Gilbert H. Deitch, Michael Clutter, for appellant. Hinson McAuliffe, Solicitor, Thomas R. Moran, Jr., Assistant Solicitor, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, for appellee.

Consequently, the judgment of this court stands reversed, the verdict and judgment of the trial court are reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinions of the Supreme Court.

Judgment of trial court reversed.

Deen, P. J., and Quillian, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webb, Judge.

Five jurors aren’t enough! There must be at least six. So held the Supreme Court of the United States in four separate opinions reversing this court’s decision in Ballew v. State, 138 Ga. App. 530 (227 SE2d 65) (1976), — U. S. — (98 SC 1029, 55 LE2d 234) (1978).

In our consideration of the five-man jury issue, we were bound by Sanders v. State, 234 Ga. 586 (216 SE2d 838) (1975), cert. den., 424 U. S. 931 (1976). Also in Williams v. Florida, 399 U. S. 78, 91 n. 28 (90 SC 1893, 26 LE2d 446, 455) (1970) the Supreme Court of the United States had said: "We have no occasion in this case to determine what minimum number can still constitute a 'jury,’ but we do not doubt that six is above that minimum.” The Supreme Court’s decision now has removed that equivocation, and has established that a jury of fewer than six persons deprived Ballew of the right to trial by jury guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.¹

[830]*830Decided May 3, 1978. Gilbert H. Deitch, Michael Clutter, for appellant. Hinson McAuliffe, Solicitor, Thomas R. Moran, Jr., Assistant Solicitor, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, for appellee.

Consequently, the judgment of this court stands reversed, the verdict and judgment of the trial court are reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinions of the Supreme Court.

Judgment of trial court reversed.

Deen, P. J., and Quillian, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 S.E.2d 169, 145 Ga. App. 829, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballew-v-state-gactapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack