Ballew v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ballew v. State

241 S.E.2d 19, 144 Ga. App. 238, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2653

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ballew v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 Ga. App. 530 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1977·No. 54540·Published

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

A review of the evidence in this case conclusively shows that the evidence demands as a matter of law that the films "Dream Come True” and "The Heist” are obscene and are nothing more than hard core pornography. Thus the conviction and sentencing of the defendant for criminal violations arising under Code § 26-2101 are affirmed.

All other enumerated errors have no merit.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Chief Judge.

A review of the evidence in this case conclusively shows that the evidence demands as a matter of law that the films "Dream Come True” and "The Heist” are obscene and are nothing more than hard core pornography. Thus the conviction and sentencing of the defendant for criminal violations arising under Code § 26-2101 are affirmed.

All other enumerated errors have no merit.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray and Smith, JJ., concur.

Ballew v. State, 241 S.E.2d 19, 144 Ga. App. 238, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2653 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

241 S.E.2d 19 (Ballew v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.