Ballew v. Schlosser

48 P. 182, 5 Okla. 146
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 12, 1897
StatusPublished

This text of 48 P. 182 (Ballew v. Schlosser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ballew v. Schlosser, 48 P. 182, 5 Okla. 146 (Okla. 1897).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam:

This case was filed in this court on December 12, 1895. June 1, 1896, by stipulation of all parties, the cause was continued for the June term,1896. The case was placed upon the docket for hearing at the January term, 1897, and when reached an order made taking the case upon the record and briefs. At the time said order was so made, we were advised by the clerk that briefs had been filed and that the case had been duly prosecuted. It appears upon a subsequent examination that no briefs for either the appellant or appellees have ever been filed in this court, and that no application has been made for leave to file briefs out of time. The questions raised in the assignments of error and cross-petition by the appellees appear upon their face to be intricate, and a correct determination would necessarily consume a great deal of time. We feel that if *147 counsel for parties who have canses in this court do not consider the interests of their clients of sufficient importance to properly brief the case, that we should not consume time which can well be applied to other work in determining a case of that nature, and we are therefore of the opinion that this case should be dismissed for failure upon the part of the parties to prosecute their appeals, and it is therefore ordered that said case be dismissed, and that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 P. 182, 5 Okla. 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballew-v-schlosser-okla-1897.