Balleta v. 35 Park Avenue Corp.
This text of 26 A.D.3d 195 (Balleta v. 35 Park Avenue Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[196]*196Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered August 5, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted the motion of defendant 35 Park Avenue Corporation for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
There was no evidence that defendant owner 35 Park Avenue had notice of the alleged hazard, a wet area in the vestibule of its premises. Moreover, as an out-of-possession landlord, 35 Park Avenue was not, even with a right of reentry, responsible for remediating the nonstructural hazard at issue (see McDonald v Riverbay Corp., 308 AD2d 345, 346 [2003]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A.D.3d 195, 808 N.Y.S.2d 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balleta-v-35-park-avenue-corp-nyappdiv-2006.