Ballentine v. Ballentine
15 A. 859, 2 Monag. 333, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 803
Opinion
None of the assignments of error in this case can be sustained. The court committed no error; hence judgment must be sustained.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ballentine v. Ballentine, 15 A. 859, 2 Monag. 333, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 803 (Pa. 1888).
15 A. 859 (Ballentine v. Ballentine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Armstrong v. Connelly
149 A. 87 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Prondzinski v. Garbutt
86 N.W. 969 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1901)
Epstein & Bro. v. M. Ferst & Co.
35 Fla. 498 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1895)