Ballentine v. Ballentine
15 A. 859, 2 Monag. 333, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 803
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 18, 1888
DocketNo. 195
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 15 A. 859 (Ballentine v. Ballentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ballentine v. Ballentine, 15 A. 859, 2 Monag. 333, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 803 (Pa. 1888).
Opinion
None of the assignments of error in this case can be sustained. The court committed no error; hence judgment must be sustained.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Armstrong v. Connelly
149 A. 87 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Prondzinski v. Garbutt
86 N.W. 969 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1901)
Epstein & Bro. v. M. Ferst & Co.
35 Fla. 498 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1895)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 A. 859, 2 Monag. 333, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballentine-v-ballentine-pa-1888.