Ballentine v. Ballentine
164 A. 5, 112 N.J. Eq. 222
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Advisory Master Reed.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Beogan, Heher, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ballentine v. Ballentine, 164 A. 5, 112 N.J. Eq. 222 (N.J. 1933).
164 A. 5 (Ballentine v. Ballentine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Laurino v. Laurino
100 A.2d 301 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Brown v. Brown
100 A.2d 315 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Sprague v. Sprague
131 N.J. Eq. 104 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1942)
Kraskin v. Kraskin
104 F.2d 218 (D.C. Circuit, 1939)