Ballentine v. Ballentine

164 A. 5, 112 N.J. Eq. 222
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 5, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 164 A. 5 (Ballentine v. Ballentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ballentine v. Ballentine, 164 A. 5, 112 N.J. Eq. 222 (N.J. 1933).

Opinion

*227 Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Advisory Master Reed.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Beogan, Heher, Kays, Heteield, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Laurino v. Laurino
100 A.2d 301 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Brown v. Brown
100 A.2d 315 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Sprague v. Sprague
131 N.J. Eq. 104 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1942)
Kraskin v. Kraskin
104 F.2d 218 (D.C. Circuit, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 A. 5, 112 N.J. Eq. 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballentine-v-ballentine-nj-1933.