Ballen v. PLAZA DEL PRADO CONDO.

319 So. 2d 90
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 16, 1975·No. 75-71·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

319 So.2d 90 (1975)

Ivin BALLEN and Rose Ballen, His Wife, Appellants,
v.
PLAZA DEL PRADO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

No. 75-71.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

September 16, 1975.
Rehearing Denied October 15, 1975.

Caidin, Rothenberg, Kogan, Kornblum & Benjamin, Miami, for appellants.

Weissenborn, Burr & Hyman and Gary M. Carman, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Two points are presented in this appeal by a defendant from a judgment of foreclosure. There is no showing in the briefs or the record that either question was ever presented to the trial court. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed upon the rule stated in Caldwell v. Peoples Bank of Sanford, *91 1917, 73 Fla. 1165, 75 So. 848. See also Lee County Oil Company v. Marshall, Fla.App. 1957, 98 So.2d 510, and the cases cited therein.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ballen v. PLAZA DEL PRADO CONDO., 319 So. 2d 90 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

319 So. 2d 90 (Ballen v. PLAZA DEL PRADO CONDO.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

S.L.H. Investment Corp. v. K-Site 700 Associates
613 So. 2d 546 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Martin v. Pinellas County
533 So. 2d 1183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Price v. Price
389 So. 2d 666 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Schatz v. Schatz
356 So. 2d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)