Ballen v. PLAZA DEL PRADO CONDO.
This text of 319 So. 2d 90 (Ballen v. PLAZA DEL PRADO CONDO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ivin BALLEN and Rose Ballen, His Wife, Appellants,
v.
PLAZA DEL PRADO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Caidin, Rothenberg, Kogan, Kornblum & Benjamin, Miami, for appellants.
Weissenborn, Burr & Hyman and Gary M. Carman, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Two points are presented in this appeal by a defendant from a judgment of foreclosure. There is no showing in the briefs or the record that either question was ever presented to the trial court. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed upon the rule stated in Caldwell v. Peoples Bank of Sanford, *91 1917, 73 Fla. 1165, 75 So. 848. See also Lee County Oil Company v. Marshall, Fla.App. 1957, 98 So.2d 510, and the cases cited therein.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
319 So. 2d 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballen-v-plaza-del-prado-condo-fladistctapp-1975.