Balle v. Martin's Seafood Restaurant
Opinion
By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing- date June 30, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed' with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.
The petition for allowance of attorney’s fees is hereby granted in the amount of $250.00.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
183 So. 2d 688 (Balle v. Martin's Seafood Restaurant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.