Balle v. Martin's Seafood Restaurant

183 So. 2d 688, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3734
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 9, 1966·No. No. 34641·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing- date June 30, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed' with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

The petition for allowance of attorney’s fees is hereby granted in the amount of $250.00.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THORNAL, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balle v. Martin's Seafood Restaurant, 183 So. 2d 688, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3734 (Fla. 1966).

183 So. 2d 688 (Balle v. Martin's Seafood Restaurant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Florida Board of Bar Examiners
183 So. 2d 688 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)