Ballas v. Palodar Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ballas v. Palodar Realty Co.

240 A.D. 1000

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 1000 (Ballas v. Palodar Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ballas v. Palodar Realty Co., 240 A.D. 1000 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial affirmed, with costs. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper and Carswell, JJ., concur; Davis, J.: I dissent on the question of costs. Costs in this type of appeal being discretionary with this court under section 1491 of the Civil Practice Act, I think that discretion should be exercised to allow costs to respondent to abide the event, rather than impose a heavy burden on the plaintiff which may result in denial of right to a new trial. Otherwise I concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial affirmed, with costs. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper and Carswell, JJ., concur; Davis, J.: I dissent on the question of costs. Costs in this type of appeal being discretionary with this court under section 1491 of the Civil Practice Act, I think that discretion should be exercised to allow costs to respondent to abide the event, rather than impose a heavy burden on the plaintiff which may result in denial of right to a new trial. Otherwise I concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 1000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballas-v-palodar-realty-co-nyappdiv-1933.