Ballard v. State

112 S.W.2d 452, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 945

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ballard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 Tex. Crim. 188 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 12, 1938·No. No. 19297·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the theft of property over the value of $50; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

No error has been perceived justifying a reversal of the conviction.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the theft of property over the value of $50; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

No error has been perceived justifying a reversal of the conviction.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Ballard v. State, 112 S.W.2d 452, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 945 (Tex. 1938).

Pincite

112 S.W.2d 452 (Ballard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.