Ballard v. State of Nevada
This text of Ballard v. State of Nevada (Ballard v. State of Nevada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 DANIEL DEAN BALLARD, Case No. 3:21-cv-00460-RCJ-WGC
4 Plaintiff ORDER
5 v.
6 STATE OF NEVADA et al.,
7 Defendants 8
9 I. DISCUSSION 10 Plaintiff, who is incarcerated in the custody of the Nevada Department of 11 Corrections (“NDOC”), has submitted both a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 12 § 1983 and a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this action. (ECF Nos. 4-1, 6). Plaintiff 13 cannot pursue both types of claims in the same case. See Nettles v. Grounds, 830 F.3d 14 922, 927 (9th Cir. 2016) (reiterating that “habeas is the exclusive vehicle for claims 15 brought by state prisoners that fall within the core of habeas, and such claims may not be 16 brought in a § 1983 action”); Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 81–82 (2005) (holding 17 that “a state prisoner's § 1983 action is barred (absent prior invalidation)—no matter the 18 relief sought (damages or equitable relief), no matter the target of the prisoner's suit (state 19 conduct leading to conviction or internal prison proceedings)—if success in that action 20 would necessarily demonstrate the invalidity of confinement or its duration”). Plaintiff may 21 pursue either his § 1983 complaint or his habeas petition in this case but not both. He 22 may file the other action in a separate case. 23 By Tuesday, December 28, 2021, Plaintiff will file a notice with the Court indicating 24 whether he: (1) wishes to pursue his § 1983 civil rights complaint (ECF No. 4-1) and strike 25 his habeas related filings (ECF Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11) in this case; or (2) strike his § 1983 26 civil rights complaint (ECF No. 4-1) and pursue his habeas related filings in this case. If 27 Plaintiff does not designate one of these options, the Court will dismiss the entire case 28 without prejudice because Plaintiff cannot proceed simultaneously on both his § 1983 1 complaint and habeas petition in the same case. 2 Additionally, Plaintiff must file a fully complete application to proceed in forma 3 pauperis on this Court’s approved form and submit the required attachments by Tuesday 4 December 28, 2021 or face possible dismissal of this action. (See ECF No. 3). Although 5 Plaintiff filed the first three pages of his application to proceed in forma pauperis on this 6 Court’s approved form, he has not filed a financial certificate on this Court’s approved 7 form—page 4 of the application—and has not submitted an inmate account statement for 8 the past six months. (See ECF Nos. 4, 5). As such, Plaintiff has yet to file a fully complete 9 application to proceed in forma pauperis. 10 II. CONCLUSION 11 It is therefore ordered that, by Tuesday, December 28, 2021, Plaintiff will file both 12 a financial certificate on this Court’s approved form and an inmate account statement for 13 the past six months. 14 It is further ordered that, if Plaintiff fails to file a fully complete application to proceed 15 in forma pauperis by the deadline, the Court will recommend dismissing this case without 16 prejudice. 17 It is further ordered that, by Tuesday, December 28, 2021, Plaintiff will file a notice 18 with the Court indicating whether he: (1) wishes to pursue his § 1983 civil rights complaint 19 (ECF No. 4-1) and strike his habeas related filings (ECF Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11) in this 20 case; or (2) strike his § 1983 civil rights complaint (ECF No. 4-1) and pursue his habeas 21 related filings in this case. 22 It is further ordered that, if Plaintiff fails to inform the Court whether he is pursuing 23 his § 1983 civil rights complaint or habeas petition in this case, the Court will dismiss the 24 entire case without prejudice because Plaintiff cannot pursue both actions simultaneously 25 in the same case. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court will send Plaintiff courtesy copies of 2| (1) its previous order (ECF No. 3); (2) this Court’s approved application to proceed in forma pauperis for prisoners; and (3) the docket sheet. 4 DATED: December 8, 2021. ° Pt CG. Cott 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ballard v. State of Nevada, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballard-v-state-of-nevada-nvd-2021.