Ballard v. State

119 So. 146, 96 Fla. 566
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 20, 1928·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and” adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby reversed on authority of Smith v. State, decided at this term of Court.

Ellis, C.'J.,. and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ballard v. State, 119 So. 146, 96 Fla. 566 (Fla. 1928).

119 So. 146 (Ballard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vazquez v. State
405 So. 2d 177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
State v. Dixon
193 So. 2d 62 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Florida Motor Lines, Inc. v. Bradley
164 So. 360 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Miami Oil Co. v. Florida Discount Corp.
135 So. 845 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)