Ballard v. Lazaroff

Ohio Supreme Court

Ballard v. Lazaroff

790 N.E.2d 1219, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1455

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 3, 2003

Docket2003-0964

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 790 N.E.2d 1219 (Ballard v. Lazaroff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ballard v. Lazaroff, 790 N.E.2d 1219, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1455 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition for a writ of habeas

[1456]*1456corpus. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that a writ of habeas corpus be, and hereby is, allowed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondent file a return of the writ within 20 days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within 10 days of filing of the return.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that it is not necessary to convey the prisoner before the court as prescribed in R.C. 2725.12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI