Ballard v. Lazaroff

Ohio Supreme Court

Ballard v. Lazaroff

790 N.E.2d 1219, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1455

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 3, 2003·No. 2003-0964·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition for a writ of habeas

[1456]*1456corpus. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that a writ of habeas corpus be, and hereby is, allowed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondent file a return of the writ within 20 days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within 10 days of filing of the return.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that it is not necessary to convey the prisoner before the court as prescribed in R.C. 2725.12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition for a writ of habeas

[1456]*1456corpus. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that a writ of habeas corpus be, and hereby is, allowed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that respondent file a return of the writ within 20 days of service of the petition, and petitioner may file a response within 10 days of filing of the return.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that it is not necessary to convey the prisoner before the court as prescribed in R.C. 2725.12.

Ballard v. Lazaroff, 790 N.E.2d 1219, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1455 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

790 N.E.2d 1219 (Ballard v. Lazaroff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related