Ballard v. Haines

42 S.E. 218, 115 Ga. 847, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 622
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 18, 1902·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. The phrase, “shall apply to the processioners,” as used in the Civil Code, § 3244, authorizing proceedings for the processioning of land, necessarily refers to an application in writing, and it follows that without such an application there can be no lawful proceedings under that section.

2. As there was in the present case no written application, the trial court did not err in sustaining a motion to dismiss “the case,” based on the ground, among others, of the “ insufficiency of the proceedings.”

Judgment-affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Leviis, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ballard v. Haines, 42 S.E. 218, 115 Ga. 847, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 622 (Ga. 1902).

42 S.E. 218 (Ballard v. Haines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Philpot v. Wells
26 S.E.2d 155 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Caverly v. Stovall
68 S.E. 442 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)