Ballard v. Haines
This text of 42 S.E. 218 (Ballard v. Haines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The phrase, “shall apply to the processioners,” as used in the Civil Code, § 3244, authorizing proceedings for the processioning of land, necessarily refers to an application in writing, and it follows that without such an application there can be no lawful proceedings under that section.
2. As there was in the present case no written application, the trial court did not err in sustaining a motion to dismiss “the case,” based on the ground, among others, of the “ insufficiency of the proceedings.”
Judgment-affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 S.E. 218, 115 Ga. 847, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballard-v-haines-ga-1902.