Ballard v. Chief of Virginia Department State Police

Fourth Circuit

Ballard v. Chief of Virginia Department State Police

56 F. App'x 185

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2003·No. No. 02-7786·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mario L. Ballard appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny Ballard’s petition for writ of mandamus and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ballard v. Chief of Va. Dep’t State Police, No. CA-02-202 (E.D. Va. Nov. 1, 2002; Nov. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [186] materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mario L. Ballard appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny Ballard’s petition for writ of mandamus and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ballard v. Chief of Va. Dep’t State Police, No. CA-02-202 (E.D. Va. Nov. 1, 2002; Nov. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [186] materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ballard v. Chief of Virginia Department State Police, 56 F. App'x 185 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

56 F. App'x 185 (Ballard v. Chief of Virginia Department State Police) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.