Ballard v. Chief of Virginia Department State Police
This text of 56 F. App'x 185 (Ballard v. Chief of Virginia Department State Police) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mario L. Ballard appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny Ballard’s petition for writ of mandamus and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ballard v. Chief of Va. Dep’t State Police, No. CA-02-202 (E.D. Va. Nov. 1, 2002; Nov. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [186]*186materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F. App'x 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballard-v-chief-of-virginia-department-state-police-ca4-2003.