Ballard v. Chairman, Virginia Parole Board

Fourth Circuit

Ballard v. Chairman, Virginia Parole Board

60 F. App'x 465

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2003·No. 03-6137·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mario Ballard appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion to amend his complaint in an action that was closed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Ballard v. Chairman, Va. Parole Bd., No. CA-01-235-7 (W.D.Va. Sept. 30, 2002). Ballard’s motion for hearing en banc is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mario Ballard appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion to amend his complaint in an action that was closed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Ballard v. Chairman, Va. Parole Bd., No. CA-01-235-7 (W.D.Va. Sept. 30, 2002). Ballard’s motion for hearing en banc is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ballard v. Chairman, Virginia Parole Board, 60 F. App'x 465 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

60 F. App'x 465 (Ballard v. Chairman, Virginia Parole Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.