Ballard v. Bank of America, NA
This text of 578 F. App'x 226 (Ballard v. Bank of America, NA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Charles Ballard appeals the district court’s orders setting aside the state court’s entry of default judgment and granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ballard v. Bank of Am., NA, No. 2:12-cv-02496 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 29, 2013; Nov. 7, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
578 F. App'x 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballard-v-bank-of-america-na-ca4-2014.