Ballard v. Bank of America, NA

578 F. App'x 226
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 11, 2014·No. No. 14-1121·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Ballard appeals the district court’s orders setting aside the state court’s entry of default judgment and granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ballard v. Bank of Am., NA, No. 2:12-cv-02496 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 29, 2013; Nov. 7, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ballard v. Bank of America, NA, 578 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2014).

578 F. App'x 226 (Ballard v. Bank of America, NA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related