Ballance v. True

Fourth Circuit

Ballance v. True

87 F. App'x 911

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2004·No. No. 03-7835·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kevin M. Ballance appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Ballance v. True, No. CA-03-1263-AM (E.D.Va. Oct. 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kevin M. Ballance appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Ballance v. True, No. CA-03-1263-AM (E.D.Va. Oct. 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Ballance v. True, 87 F. App'x 911 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

87 F. App'x 911 (Ballance v. True) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related