Ballance v. Rowlette
This text of 11 F. App'x 174 (Ballance v. Rowlette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In these consolidated cases, Kevin M. Ballance appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ballance v. Rowlette, No. CA-99-572-7 (W.D.Va. Sep. 27, 2000), and Ballance v. Young, No. CA-99-746-7 (W.D.Va. Oct. 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 F. App'x 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballance-v-rowlette-ca4-2001.