Ballance v. Leonard

37 Ill. 43
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1865
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 37 Ill. 43 (Ballance v. Leonard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ballance v. Leonard, 37 Ill. 43 (Ill. 1865).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the court :

It has been again and again ruled by this court, that when a bill of exceptions does not purport to contain all the evidence, ■ the verdict of the jury will not be questioned. We cannot enquire in such case, if the verdict is supported by the evidence, but must presume that it is. Warner v. Carlton, 22 Ill., 422; Stickney et al. v. Cassell 1 Gilman, 420; Harris et al. v. Winer, 28 Ill., 138.

So with respect to Marshall’s deed, we cannot say, all the evidence not being before us, whether it was properly admitted or not.

Hor can we pass upon the instructions, as they are not incorporated into the record. The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed,.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sutton v. Board of Education
259 Ill. App. 193 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1930)
Siegle v. Mitchell
249 Ill. App. 116 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1928)
The People v. Nelson
150 N.E. 686 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1926)
Kinnare v. The Michigan Central R. R.
70 Ill. App. 373 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1897)
Gilbert v. Kuppenheimer
67 Ill. App. 251 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1896)
Watson v. Hahn
1 Colo. 494 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1872)
Kinnear v. Tucker
1 Colo. 74 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1867)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 Ill. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballance-v-leonard-ill-1865.