Ballance v. Forsyth

Supreme Court

Ballance v. Forsyth

62 U.S. 389, 16 L. Ed. 143, 21 How. 389, 1858 U.S. LEXIS 656

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 21, 1859

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 62 U.S. 389 (Ballance v. Forsyth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ballance v. Forsyth, 62 U.S. 389, 16 L. Ed. 143, 21 How. 389, 1858 U.S. LEXIS 656 (1859).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice TANEY

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case was dismissed on the 20th. of December last, because it did not appear that an appeal had been taken in the District Court. A motion ■ has now béen made to reinstate the. case, and, in support of that motion, a written agreement, signed by the counsel for the appellant and appellee, has been filed, consenting to reinstate the case, to waive all irregularities,- and to try the case on the merits.

But the consent of parties cannot give jurisdiction to this *390 court, where the law does not give it. And, without an appeal taken in the District Court, this court has no jurisdiction, and the consent of parties cannot cure the defect. The motion is therefore overruled:

But if the plaintiff in error desires to supply the omission, and take an appeal in the District Court, and bring his case legally before us, he has leave, in order to save expense, to withdraw the transcript now filed, and to use it upon his appeal, leaving a receipt for it with the clerk of this court.' ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI