Ballance v. Curtenius

12 Ill. 416
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1851
StatusPublished

This text of 12 Ill. 416 (Ballance v. Curtenius) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ballance v. Curtenius, 12 Ill. 416 (Ill. 1851).

Opinion

Trumbull, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendants in ejectment, to recover one acre of land off of the east side of the south west and south-east fractional quarters of section nine, in township eight, north of range eight east, situated in the county of Peoria, and State of Illinois.

Plea, not guilty. Jury trial and verdict for the defendants.

The plaintiff, to support the issue on his part, proved the defendants in possession of part of the premises sued for at the commencement of the action, and offered in evidence, the same tax title which has already been passed upon in the case of Spellman v. Curtenius, ante, 409.

The Court excluded the tax deed from the consideration of the jury, and in so doing committed an error, as has been already decided in the case alluded to. No objections were made to the tax title in this case, which were not urged in that, and reference is made to the opinion in that case, for the reasons of our decision in this.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Ill. 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballance-v-curtenius-ill-1851.