Ball v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
207 A.2d 614, 237 Md. 658, 1965 Md. LEXIS 798
Opinion
For the reasons assigned by Judge Prendergast below, the application must be denied.
Judge Prendergast stated at the hearing that all questions, except those treated by him, had been abandoned. In this Court, the petitioner makes the bald statement that he did not authorize anyone to abandon any of his contentions. A reading of applicant’s original petition reveals no valid ground for relief which was not considered and rejected by Judge Prendergast.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ball v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 207 A.2d 614, 237 Md. 658, 1965 Md. LEXIS 798 (Md. 1965).
207 A.2d 614 (Ball v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.