Ball v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Ball v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

207 A.2d 614, 237 Md. 658, 1965 Md. LEXIS 798

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedMarch 10, 1965

DocketApp. No. 105

StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.2d 614 (Ball v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ball v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 207 A.2d 614, 237 Md. 658, 1965 Md. LEXIS 798 (Md. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons assigned by Judge Prendergast below, the application must be denied.

Judge Prendergast stated at the hearing that all questions, except those treated by him, had been abandoned. In this Court, the petitioner makes the bald statement that he did not authorize anyone to abandon any of his contentions. A reading of applicant’s original petition reveals no valid ground for relief which was not considered and rejected by Judge Prendergast.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

For the reasons assigned by Judge Prendergast below, the application must be denied.

Judge Prendergast stated at the hearing that all questions, except those treated by him, had been abandoned. In this Court, the petitioner makes the bald statement that he did not authorize anyone to abandon any of his contentions. A reading of applicant’s original petition reveals no valid ground for relief which was not considered and rejected by Judge Prendergast.

Application denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.2d 614, 237 Md. 658, 1965 Md. LEXIS 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ball-v-warden-of-maryland-penitentiary-md-1965.